They say they won’t use silicon, whereas tesla said they would on battery day. For its upsides and low costs, and apparent scalability, I don’t think Tesla bought these people
My guess is FSD will detect the speed bump ahead of time and adjust air suspension to where you barely feel it. Would be great if they had an option “ignore speed bumps”
I would do FSD at 7k but not 10k. If they want to be stubborn, I won’t take delivery. Straight up says on the website “ordering now will lock in your price against future increases.” I doubt tesla will get funny with us, but if they do, walk away!
Maybe the back window will be bigger than the unveil, and that’s one of the improvements Elon was talking about. He has mentioned changing the window sill angle so who knows. You are correct about roof line and passenger head level. I think the majority of customers prefer the glass, so the...
The slope of the roof makes its being glass useful. The tiny back window will have poor visibility, whereas with a glass roof, it’s not an issue. Cameras also help, but the glass roof is neat.
That Warren redlich guy on YouTube keeps saying the CT will have a 150 kWH battery for the tri motor. The math doesn’t add up. Cleanerwatt did a video showing the WH/mile to require at least a 180 kWh battery. With 560, seems clear it will be a 200 kWh battery
Would the new batteries degrade less than old ones? IE be able to handle a higher rate for longer. To me this is more important than peak rate—ability to sustain it longer.
Premium cost for CT rides + it’s just icing on the cake. If your truck can be making you money passively to get your monthly note to 0, that’s amazing.
We have a new very good baseline to improve from. Especially once it’s rolled out to more vehicles and they collect more data. To the other guy, I don’t care about sayings.